Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Whitcomb v. Smithson — Opinion of the Court

It was adverse to plaintiff, and without his assent, and the trial court rightly held that it did not operate to make the cause then removable and thereby to enable the other defendants to prevent plaintiff from taking a verdict against them. The right to remove was not contingent on the aspect the case may have assumed on the facts developed on the merits of the issues tried. As we have said, the contention that the railway company was fraudulently joined as a defendant had been disposed of by the circuit court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature