Summary

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

The Russian workers, the students, and the whole of the intelligentsia hated the army consciously as the instrument of oppression and the tool of the autocracy. On their part, it was a frank and unsparing animosity, a glowing hatred. The broad masses of the people certainly could not share this animosity—and yet the fear of the army and the dislike of a soldier's life were even greater among simple people. It was the blind fear of a primitive man before a gigantic machine. The very mechanical nature of the army terrified the peasants. A soldier has no soul, no individuality.
Source: Wikisource

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

This so-called discipline was indeed very useful to the autocracy in peace time, because the authorities could always rely on the army. But war was another matter. Russian discipline not only did not train the soldiers for war, but actually destroyed in every soldier and in the army as a whole the instinct and the skill for war. The very obedience which was so great an asset in peace time, when the soldier had to fight against his own people during revolutionary risings—this blind obedience was a grave impediment in war. Certainly in war, too, the soldier's obedience is very necessary.
Source: Wikisource

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

As a matter of fact, just as there was probably too much praise for the Russian soldier during the first three years of the war, so there has undoubtedly been too much blame in the past year. Instead of praising or blaming him, it is necessary to try to unveil the mystery of the Russian soldier, to try to understand what he was and how he lived, and what were the effects of the war upon him. One thing is certain: people in this country not only do not know anything about the Russian soldier—they have not the least idea of even a rough standard of comparison by which to judge him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature