Summary

Ministry of War Transport Report of the Departmental Committee on Traffic Signs (1946)

On roads where there is no system of street lighting and vehicles normally drive with headlamps on, the use of reflecting lenses is, in the absence of direct illumination of the signs, a satisfactory method of rendering signs conspicuous and legible at night, provided the signs are properly sited in relation to the carriageway. We recommend that, on unlighted roads, all warning, prohibitory and mandatory signs for which direct illumination is not practicable should be fitted with reflecting lenses.
Source: Wikisource

Ministry of War Transport Report of the Departmental Committee on Traffic Signs (1946)

It has been suggested that on main thoroughfares where vehicular and pedestrian traffic are both heavy but there is little vehicular cross-traffic, signals located at suitable intervals should be linked together on a flexible progressive system so that the vehicular traffic moves smoothly along the whole route at a uniform speed in platoons, and pedestrians can cross the road safely in the gaps between the platoons when the signals are showing red to vehicular and green to pedestrian traffic.
Source: Wikisource

Ministry of War Transport Report of the Departmental Committee on Traffic Signs (1946)

If in exceptional cases a warning sign is required on a length of fenced road, a sign bearing the words “Wandering Animals” should be specially authorised.
We are strongly of opinion that responsibility for giving warning, of danger from animals crossing a road (say from fields to a farm building) , or from animals being led or driven along a road, should continue to rest on the person or persons in charge of them and that no warning signs should be necessary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature