“ What right have we, under any pretence whatever, to deny the obligation of a law, so plainly, so solemnly, so awfully promulgated by the God of heaven himself? The very position of the fourth commandment in the decalogue, might teach men to regard it with peculiar veneration. It is the link that binds together heaven and earth—our duty to God and our duty to our neighbour. It is the pillar that supports the whole moral and religious fabric. To attempt to set aside the obligation to observe the fourth commandment, is therefore, in our view, a daring attack on the authority of the Lawgiver. ”
Summary
"Mutiny," an anonymous theological treatise, examines the enduring moral authority of the Ten Commandments within Christianity, probing the relationship between Old Testament law and New Testament teachings. Focusing on Sabbath observance, the work contends that the decalogue's duties remain binding, challenging ideas of its repeal under Christian dispensation.
Through scriptural analysis and comparisons between Jewish and Christian practices, it argues that the Sabbath's spiritual and communal aspects—rooted in divine authority—cannot be ignored, presenting the law as a moral foundation rather than a strict code. The text’s central thesis rests on the unavoidable duty of obedience to God’s commandments, asserting that their repeal lacks explicit biblical support.
Quotes from Mutiny ()
“ Christianity presents a new and powerful motive for obedience—namely gratitude for the incarnation and death of the Son of God; but this neither changes the nature of man’s moral obligation, nor removes the necessity of a positive enactment to guide him in his obedience, and enforce conformity to God’s will. If then in spirit and essence the moral requirements of the law and of the gospel were the same, what reason should there be for setting aside the decalogue, and what authority have we to ignore it without an express command from God? ”
“ No one can say, that there is an express declaration in the New Testament, to the effect, that the decalogue is set aside under the present dispensation. Those who arrive at the conclusion, must confess, that it is merely inferential. In this respect, then, both parties stand on equal ground. Neither our opponents nor ourselves can adduce an undoubted and positive declaration. But we ask which have the greatest need of such a declaration—they who assert that the moral law, written and pronounced by God himself, has been abrogated, or they who affirm that it is still in force? ”
