Summary

Nathan Clifford Morning Light (69 U.S. 550) — Opinion of the Court

That comparing the testimony given by the crew of the Morning Light with the statement in the protest made directly after the occurrence by the crew of the Jerry Fowler, the fair weight of evidence was that all hands aboard each vessel were bewildered and confused by finding themselves in sudden and dangerous proximity to each other in a thick fog, and that the collision consequent thereto was the result of accident common and unavoidable to both. That each party, under the circumstances, was accordingly bound to bear his own loss.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Morning Light (69 U.S. 550) — Opinion of the Court

Examples are to be found in the reported cases where collisions have occurred exclusively from natural causes, and without any negligence or fault, either on the part of the owners of the respective vessels, or of those intrusted with their care and management, and where the facts are so, the rule of law is that the loss must rest where it fell, on the principle that no one is responsible for such an accident.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Morning Light (69 U.S. 550) — Opinion of the Court

There was no attempt to prove that the Morning Light had, at any time, shortened sail or lain to.
The witnesses on each vessel asserted that a light was suspended in a place for being easily seen from the other; and on each side it is asserted that neither discovered any light exhibited upon the other vessel. The witnesses on the Morning Light testified to a darkness so extreme as to disable them discerning objects distant less than her length off. Some on the Jerry Fowler state that they saw the other vessel coming upon them half a mile distant.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature