Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Barrows v. Kindred — Opinion of the Court

Where a plaintiff shows no title, and is therefore defeated, it is not easy to perceive how any title can be said to have been established in the action, or how, under the statute, the result can affect his right to bring a new action for the same premises. We are not advised of any authoritative interpretation of the statute, in this aspect, by the courts of Illinois. If one were shown we should follow it. But, in the view which we take of this case, it may be conceded that the judgment has the same effect upon the parties, and those in privity with them, as a judgment in a common-law action.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Barrows v. Kindred — Opinion of the Court

Where a judgment is rendered for the plaintiff, the title upon which he recovered is thereby established, and the construction and effect of the statute are obvious. He must recover in all cases, if at all, upon the strength of his own title, and not upon the weakness of his adversary's. It is not incumbent upon the defendant to show any title.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature