Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Morgan v. Beloit City and Town…

But this court has wisely abrogated that rule, and by its twenty-first rule in equity, provides that 'the prayer of the bill shall ask the special relief to which the plaintiff supposes himself entitled, and also shall contain a prayer for general relief.'
On merits, the case is not good. Though equity is liberal in the adaptation of her remedies, she does not give a remedy to every party merely because he is in difficulty, nor unless his difficulty be covered by some specific ground of equitable jurisdiction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Morgan v. Beloit City and Town…

The only question before us is, whether there is a remedy in equity. It may be, as suggested by the counsel for the appellant, that an action would lie upon the statute. It is also possible that a proper case for a writ of mandamus might be made. But these inquiries are only material as bearing upon the question whether there is an adequate remedy at law. If so, a suit in equity cannot be maintained.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Morgan v. Beloit City and Town…

The remedy at law is, therefore, neither plain nor adequate.
The question, whether a bill in equity will lie, is disembarrassed of this objection.
The authority to tax for the payment of municipal liabilities, in cases like this, is in the nature of a trust. [5] The jurisdiction on a court of equity to interfere in all cases involving such an ingredient, is too clear to require any citation of authorities. It rests upon an elementary principle of equity jurisprudence.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature