Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Randall v. Kreiger — Opinion of the Court

No court of equity will interfere to compel a married woman to ratify a void letter of attorney, nor to compel her to execute or complete a conveyance attempted to be made under a void letter of attorney. No court of equity would compel the plaintiff in this cause to recognize as her deed an instrument which she never executed. A court of equity would refuse to act for no reason, however, but that the estate equitable as well as legal still belongs to the woman
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Randall v. Kreiger — Opinion of the Court

An entire failure of the power to fulfil by one of the parties, as in cases of permanent insanity, does not release the other from the pre-existing obligation. In view of the law it is still as binding as if the parties were as they were when the marriage was entered into. Perhaps the only element of a contract, in the ordinary acceptation of the term, that exists is that the consent of the parties is necessary to create the relation. It is the most important transaction of life. The happiness of those who assume its ties usually depends upon it more than upon anything else.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Randall v. Kreiger — Opinion of the Court

Claims contrary to justice and equity cannot be regarded as of that character. Consent to remedy the wrong is to be presumed. The only right taken away is the right dishonestly to repudiate an honest contract or conveyance to the injury of the other party. Even where no remedy could be had in the courts the vested right is usually unattended with the slightest equity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature