Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne United States v. Gilmore (74 U.S. 491…

If the comptroller had confirmed the decision of the auditor, a transcript of the proceedings of those officers would have been the proper evidence for the defendants to produce.
If the claims were not presented until after the account was closed upon the books of the treasury, still it was necessary to submit them for examination to both those officers. The action of both was necessary. A transcript showing that action would have been sufficient. Parol evidence in such cases is wholly inadmissible. Evidence from the books of the treasury in some form is indispensable.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne United States v. Gilmore (74 U.S. 491…

Where the offices of receiver and depositary are united in the same person, the expense accounts of the two offices are nevertheless required to be kept separately from each other.
The claims in question in the case before us grew out of that branch of Gilmore's duties which related to his office of depositary, and had no connection with his office of receiver. They should, therefore, have been presented to the first auditor for examination, and afterwards to the first comptroller for his final decision.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature