Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Leigh Ellis Company v. Davis — Opinion of the Court
“ Co. v. Leatherwood, 250 U.S. 478, 481, 39 Sup. Ct. 517, 63 L. Ed. 1096. We agree with the District Court that ecker & Sons v. Director General, 55 I. C. C. 453, should not be understood or allowed to contravene our conclusion, upon the facts here. ”
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Leigh Ellis Company v. Davis — Opinion of the Court
“ The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, adopting the opinion below as to the time within which the suit must be brought. 276 Fed. 400.We find it unnecessary to consider other defences besides the contract limitation, as we agree with the Courts below that that disposes of the case. The main objection urged is that the contract is overridden by section 206 (a) of the Transportation Act Feb. ”
