Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Paraiso v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The Bill of Rights for the Philippines, giving the accused the right to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, does not fasten forever upon those islands the inability of the seventeenth century common law to understand stand or accept a pleading that did not exclude every misinterpretation capable of occurring to intelligence fired with a desire to pervert.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Paraiso v. United States — Opinion of the Court

It would be going farther to treat it as setting up the Philippine Bill of Rights in analogy to a claim of constitutional rights in a circuit court of the United States. If a case is brought up from the circuit court on the ground that it involves the construction or application of the Constitution of the United States, the record must show that the question was raised for the consideration of the court below.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature