Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation…

Supposing the powers of the Fleet Corporation to have been given to a single man we doubt if any one would contend that the acts of Congress and the delegations of authority from the President left him any less liable than other grantees of the power of eminent domain to be called upon to defend himself in court. An instrumentality of Government he might be and for the greatest ends, but the agent, because he is agent, does not cease to be answerable for his acts.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation…

No one can contend that Congress in using the Fleet Corporation for its purposes might not have given it express immunity from suit as a representative of the United States. What we have to decide is whether in the mass of urgent legislation in respect to the government's construction and operation of shipping made indispensable by the peculiar exigencies of the great war, Congress intended that this corporate agent should be subject to suit only as its principal is.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation…

If what we have said is correct it cannot matter that the agent is a corporation rather than a single man. The meaning of incorporation is that you have a person, and as a person one that presumably is subject to the general rules of law. The only serious question is whether special remedies have been provided by statute that displace those that otherwise would be at the plaintiff's command.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature