Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation…

Congress may not even have had any consciousness of intention. The Congressional will must be divined, and by a process of interpretation which, in effect, is the ascertainment of policy immanent not merely in the single statute from which flow the rights and responsibilities of Regional, but in a series of statutes utilizing corporations for governmental purposes and drawing significance from dominant contemporaneous opinion regarding the immunity of governmental agencies from suit.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation…

In spawning these corporations during the past two decades, Congress has uniformly included amenability to law. Congress has provided for not less than forty of such corporations discharging governmental functions, and without exception the authority to-sue-and-be-sued was included. [3] Such a firm practice is partly an indication of the present climate of opinion which has brought governmental immunity from suit into disfavor, partly it reveals a definite attitude on the part of Congress which should be given hospitable scope.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation…

To give Regional an immunity denied to more than two score corporations, each designed for a purpose of government not relevantly different from that which occasioned the creation of Regional, is to impute to Congress a desire for incoherence in a body of affiliated enactments and for drastic legal differentiation where policy justifies none.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature