Summary

Phillips Chemical Company v. Dumas Independent School District…

Although Article 7173 is, in terms, applicable to all lessees who hold tax-exempt property under a lease for a term of three years or more, it appears that only lessees of public property fall within this class in Texas. Tax exemptions for real property owned by private organizations-charities, churches, and similar entities-do not survive a lease to a business lessee. [5] The full value of the leased property becomes taxable to the owner, and the lessee's indirect burden consequently is as heavy as the burden imposed directly on federal lessees by Article 5248.
Source: Wikisource

Phillips Chemical Company v. Dumas Independent School District…

It is conceded that the State and its subdivisions lease valuable property to commercial and business enterprises, as does the Federal Government. Warehouse facilities are an example. [8] But the identity of the exempt lessor bears no relation to the impact on local government of otherwise identical leasing activities. Still, the variant tax consequences to the lessee, under Article 7173 on the one hand and Article 5248 on the other, differ widely.
It is true that perfection is by no means required under the equal protection test of permissible classification.
Source: Wikisource

Phillips Chemical Company v. Dumas Independent School District…

None of these arguments, urged in support of the Texas classification, seems adequate to justify what appears to be so substantial and transparent a discrimination against the Government and its lessees. Here, Phillips is taxed under Article 5248 on the full value of the real property which it leases from the Federal Government, while businesses with similar leases, using exempt property owned by the State and its political subdivisions, are not taxed on their leaseholds at all.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature