Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Gilman v. City of Sheboygan — Opinion of the Court

The uniformity must be coextensive with the territory to which it applies. If a State tax, it must be uniform all over the State. If a county or city tax, it must be uniform throughout the extent of the territory to which it is applicable. But the uniformity in the rule required by the Constitution does not stop here. It must extend to all property subject to taxation, so that all property may be taxed alike equally-which is taxing by a uniform rule.'
We forbear to examine the soundness of the conclusions of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. They need no support at our hands.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Gilman v. City of Sheboygan — Opinion of the Court

Taxing by a uniform rule requires uniformity not only in the rate of taxation, but also uniformity in the mode of assessment upon the taxable valuation. Uniformity in taxing implies equality in the burden of taxation, and this equality of burden cannot exist without uniformity in the mode of assessment, as well as the rate of taxation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Gilman v. City of Sheboygan — Opinion of the Court

The statute prescribing the property to be taxed, and that to be wholly exempted from taxation, shows that this personal property must have been taxed for other purposes. This tax was levied exclusively upon the real estate of the City. That was a discrimination in favor of the personal property. It was beyond the constitutional power of the Legislature to make any discrimination. Property must be wholly exempted or not exempted at all.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature