Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Sullivan v. United States (395 U.S. 169…

We think it clear from the face of § 514 that state taxation of sales to servicemen is not proscribed. A tax on the privilege of selling or buying property has long been recognized as distinct from a tax on the property itself. [23] And while § 514 refers to taxes 'in respect of' rather than 'on' personal property, we think it an overly strained construction to say that taxation of the sales transaction is the same as taxation 'in respect of' the personal property transferred.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Sullivan v. United States (395 U.S. 169…

The sales and use taxes imposed by the Connecticut Education, Welfare and Public Health Tax Act [6] are typical of those enacted by the vast majority of States. [7] A tax of 3 1/2% is levied on the gross receipts from sales of tangible personal property at retail within the State. [8] Although the retailer is liable for payment of the tax, he is required to pass it on to purchasers by adding it to the original sales price of all items sold.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature