Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart All States Freight, Inc. v. New York New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company…

Thus both the legislative history and the course of the Commission's decisions clearly impel the conclusion that § 1 (6) does not apply to all-commodity rates. In reaching this conclusion, we hardly need add that, as the Act is structured, these rates are subject to full policing by the Commission under other provisions. If a commodity rate is too high, the Commission may reduce it. [26] If a commodity rate unjustly discriminates against a shipper, the Commission may order the discrimination removed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart All States Freight, Inc. v. New York New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company…

Class rates were at the foundation of the railroad rate structure at the time of the enactment of the Interstate Commerce Act in 1887. Such rates are applied to traffic through two separate tariffs. One tariff, the 'classification,' assigns each of the many thousand commodities carried by rail to one of presently some 30 categories or classes, based upon the commodity's particular characteristics. [2] A companion tariff specifies the rate at which each class of freight will be carried.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart All States Freight, Inc. v. New York New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company…

The original function of commodity rates, which are generally lower than class rates, was to encourage the movement of bulk commodities, such as coal and grain. With the onset and rapid growth of intermodal competition, the railroads increasingly turned to commodity rates in an effort to prevent diversion of traffic to other modes of transportation. Since 1932, numerous all-commodity or all-freight rail rates have been established between various points throughout the country.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature