Summary

Richard Feinberg Latency of Pupillary Reflex to Light Stimulation and Its Relationship to Aging (1965)

Moreover, if we compare the means for the extremes in the ages studied, namely, those under twenty-one and those over fifty years of age, we find that the older group definitely has a longer pupillary latency (0.273 sec.) than the younger group (0.238 sec.) . Comparing the means of these two groups, a highly significantt value of 3.92 was found with 34 degrees of freedom. The probability that the two populations would have the same mean would be less than 1 in 1000. If we compare the original pupil size and aging, we find that with aging, the pupil diameter decreases.
Source: Wikisource

Richard Feinberg Latency of Pupillary Reflex to Light Stimulation and Its Relationship to Aging (1965)

Since, in addition, the latency period increases with decreasing stimulus brightness (Lowenfeld and Lowenstein, 1959) , the large range of values for the pupillary latency period reported by competent authors is not surprising.
The prolongation of the latency period beyond its true value depends upon the steepness of the slope of increasing contraction velocity. For this reason mainly, we chose the maximal light intensity conveniently available for our experiment on aging.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature