Summary

Robert H. Jackson Securities and Exchange Commission v…

By selling from 1,000 to 2,000 acres at from $5 to $15 per acre, he could fulfill his obligation to drill the well, recoup his incidental expenses and those of the selling intermediaries, and have a thousand acres left for the gamble, with no investment of his own; and if he sold more, he would have a present profit. Without the drilling of the well, no one's leases had any value, and except for that undertaking they had been obtained at no substantial cost. The well was necessary not only to fulfill the hopes of purchasers but apparently even to avoid forfeiture of their leases.
Source: Wikisource

Robert H. Jackson Securities and Exchange Commission v…

However, both courts refused injunction because as the Court of Appeals stated it could 'find simply sales and assignments of legal and legitimate oil and gas leases i.e., sales of interests in land.' It was thought that these assignments could not be proved to be 'securities' or 'investment contracts' under § 2 (1) of the Act.
Undisputed facts seem to us however to establish the conclusion that defendants were not as a practical matter offering naked leasehold rights.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature