Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Securities and Exchange Commission v…

But we conclude that the concept of 'insurance' involves some investment risk-taking on the part of the company. The risk of mortality, assumed here, gives these variable annuities an aspect of insurance. Yet it is apparent, not real; superficial, not substantial. In hard reality the issuer of a variable annuity that has no element of a fixed return assumes no true risk in the insurance sense.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Securities and Exchange Commission v…

To this extent, the historic functions of state insurance regulation become meaningless. Prescribed limitations on investment and examination of solvency and reserves become perfectly circular to the extent that there is no obligation to pay except in terms measured by one's portfolio. But beyond controlling corporate solvency and the adequacy of reserves, and maintaining observance of the legal list of investments, the state plans of regulation do not go in regulating investment policy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Securities and Exchange Commission v…

The question common to the exemption provisions of the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act and to § 2 (b) of the McCarran-Fergusion Act is whether respondents are issuing contracts of insurance.
We start with a reluctance to disturb the state regulatory schemes that are in actual effect, either by displacing them or by superimposing federal requirements on transactions that are tailored to meet state requirements. When the States speak in the field of 'insurance,' they speak with the authority of a long tradition.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature