Summary

Portrait of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ohio v. Robinette — Concurring Opinion

From their unique vantage point, Ohio's courts observed that traffic stops in the State were regularly giving way to contraband searches, characterized as consensual, even when officers had no reason to suspect illegal activity. One Ohio appellate court noted: " [H] undreds, and perhaps thousands of Ohio citizens are being routinely delayed in their travels and asked to relinquish to uniformed police officers their right to privacy in their automobiles and luggage, sometimes for no better reason than to provide an officer the opportunity to ‘practice' his drug interdiction technique."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ohio v. Robinette — Concurring Opinion

Against this background, the Ohio Supreme Court determined, and announced in Robinette's case, that the federal and state constitutional rights of Ohio citizens to be secure in their persons and property called for the protection of a clear cut instruction to the State's police officers: An officer wishing to engage in consensual interrogation of a motorist at the conclusion of a traffic stop must first tell the motorist that he or she is free to go.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature