Samuel Blatchford, Earnshaw v. Cadwalader — Opinion of the Court
“ No statute in regard to iron ore ever permitted an allowance for the water chemically combined with it, and the act of 1883 must have the same construction in regard to all moisture, however mixed or combined with the ore.The rule is invoked by the plaintiff in error, which is set forth in Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 U.S. 609, 616, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1240, that if the question in regard to a rate of duty is one of doubt the doubt is to be resolved in favor of the importer, as duties are never imposed upon the citizen on vague or doubtful interpretations. ”
