Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Brine v. Insurance Company — Opinion of the Court

We are not insensible to the fact that the industry of counsel has been rewarded by finding cases even in this court in which the proposition that the rules of practice of the Federal courts in suits in equity cannot be controlled by the laws of the States, is expressed in terms so emphatic and so general as to seem to justify the inference here urged upon us.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Brine v. Insurance Company — Opinion of the Court

It would seem that no argument is necessary to establish the proposition that when substantial rights, resting upon a statute, which is clearly within the legislative power, come in conflict with mere forms and modes of procedure in the courts, the latter must give way, and adapt themselves to the forms necessary to give effect to such rights.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Brine v. Insurance Company — Opinion of the Court

We will close these citations by using the language which had the unanimous assent of the court in the recent case of McGoon v. Scales (9 Wall. 23) : 'It is a principle too firmly established to admit of dispute at this day, that to the law of the State in which land is situated must we look for the rules which govern its descent, alienation, and transfer, and for the effect and construction of conveyances.'
The decree in this case, the sale made under it, and the deed made on that sale, will constitute a transfer of the title within the meaning of the principle thus laid down.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature