Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Metsker v. Bonebrake — Opinion of the Court

There is no reason to disbelieve Mrs. Metsker when she swears positively that she did not know nor suspect her husband's insolvency until bankrupt proceedings were commenced. Her statement is confirmed by the allegation, undisputed, that between the time of the conveyance and the petition in bankruptcy $4,000 of their debts were paid, and the bill alleges that their debts were only $5,000 in excess of their assets.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Metsker v. Bonebrake — Opinion of the Court

Only such matters of law and of facts as are brought before the court by exceptions are to be considered, and the burden of sustaining the exception is on the objecting party. In the case before us we are inclined, after a careful examination of the testimony, to concur with the master's report. It is altogether a matter of the weight of evidence.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature