Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Tucker v. Spalding — Opinion of the Court

Whatever may be our personal opinions of the fitness of the jury as a tribunal to determine the diversity or identity in principle of two mechanical instruments, it cannot be questioned that when the plaintiff, in the exercise of the option which the law gives him, brings his suit in the law in preference to the equity side of the court, that question must be submitted to the jury, if there is so much resemblance as raises the question at all.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Tucker v. Spalding — Opinion of the Court

This court has no more right than the court below to decide that the one patent covered the invention of the other, or that it did not; and it is obvious that extended argument here, to prove such general resemblance as would require the submission of both patents to the jury, might prejudice the plaintiff's case on the new trial which must be granted.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature