Sandra Day O'Connor

Sandra Day O'Connor

Summary

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 … (1988 | noyear)

If we could be sure that each of these 19 state legislatures had deliberately chosen to authorize capital punishment for crimes committed at the age of 15, one could hardly suppose that there is a settled national consensus opposing such a practice. In fact, however, the statistics relied on by the dissent may be quite misleading. When a legislature provides for some 15-year-olds to be processed through the adult criminal justice system, and capital punishment is available for adults in that jurisdiction, the death penalty becomes at least theoretically applicable to such defendants.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 … (1988 | noyear)

Granting the plurality's other premise—that adolescents are generally less blameworthy than adults who commit similar crimes—it does not necessarily follow that all 15-year-olds are incapable of the moral culpability that would justify the imposition of capital punishment. Nor has the plurality educed evidence demonstrating that 15-year-olds as a class are inherently incapable of being deterred from major crimes by the prospect of the death penalty.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 … (1988 | noyear)

The history of the death penalty instructs that there is danger in inferring a settled societal consensus from statistics like those relied on in this case. In 1846, Michigan became the first State to abolish the death penalty for all crimes except treason, and Rhode Island soon thereafter became the first jurisdiction to abolish capital punishment completely.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature