Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Ruhlin v. New York Life Insurance Company…

Since the company is domiciled in New York and the insured lives in Pennsylvania, and 'all that is here for our consideration is the meaning, the tacit implications, of a particular set of words,' 'for the sake of harmony and to avoid confusion' we shall follow the decision of those courts and hold that the insurance company is not barred by the incontestability clause from rescinding the double indemnity and disability provisions.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Ruhlin v. New York Life Insurance Company…

On February 14, 1935, the New York Life Insurance Company, respondent here, filed its bill of complaint in the District Court for Western Pennsylvania to rescind, because of certain misrepresentations, the disability and double indemnity provisions in five policies issued on the life of defendant John G. Ruhlin, and made in favor of the other defendants as beneficiaries.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature