Summary

Stanley Matthews Claflin v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of Boston Massachusetts…

This was the established law at the time of the passage of the act of March 2, 1867, (14 St. 558) , known as the Local Prejudice Removal Act, which for the first time conferred upon the plaintiff, as well as the defendant, the right to remove a suit brought by him in a state court when the controversy was between a citizen of the state where the suit was brought and a citizen of another state, upon making and filing an affidavit that he had reason to and did believe that, from prejudice or local influence, he would not be able to obtain justice in such state court.
Source: Wikisource

Stanley Matthews Claflin v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of Boston Massachusetts…

It will be seen, therefore, on a comparison of the two statutes, that the chief differences between them are- (1) that the act of 1875 enlarges the original jurisdiction of circuit courts, based on the citizenship of the parties, to all cases of controversy between citizens of different states and between citizens of a state and aliens, retaining substantially the same exception as to suits upon contracts brought by an assignee, when the assignee could not have sued in the circuit court, but not including negotiable paper
Source: Wikisource

Stanley Matthews Claflin v. Commonwealth Insurance Company of Boston Massachusetts…

An attempt to meet it is made by seeking to limit, by construction, the right of removal given by the second section to both parties, without qualification, to the defendant only in cases where, if exercised by the plaintiff, it would create jurisdiction in the circuit court in favor of an assignee whose assignor could not have sued in that court originally.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature