Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Freeman v. Alderson — Opinion of the Court

The property itself is in such actions the defendant, and, except in cases arising during war for its hostile character, its forfeiture or sale is sought for the wrong, in the commission of which it has been the instrument, or for debts or obligations for which by poeration of law it is liable. The court acquires jurisdiction over the property in such cases by its seizure, and of the subsequent proceedings by public citation to the world, of which the owner is at liberty to avail himself by appearing as a claimant in the case.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Freeman v. Alderson — Opinion of the Court

If the non-resident possesses no property in the state, there is nothing upon which its tribunals can act. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 723. They cannot determine the validity of any demand beyond that which is satisfied by the property. For any further adjudication the defendant must be personally served with citation, or voluntarily appear in the action.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature