Supreme Court of the United States

Summary

Supreme Court of the United States William P. Barr, Attorney General… (2020)

Today's decision illustrates just how grave the consequences of such accelerated decisionmaking can be. The Court forever deprives respondents of their ability to press a constitutional challenge to their lethal injections, and prevents lower courts from reviewing that challenge. All of that is at sharp odds with this Court's own ruling mere months earlier. In its hurry to resolve the Government's emergency motions, I fear the Court has overlooked not only its prior ruling, but also its role in safeguarding robust federal judicial review.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the United States William P. Barr, Attorney General… (2020)

The Federal Government's decision to resume executions renders the question of the death penalty's constitutionality yet more pressing.
Given the finality and seriousness of a death sentence, it is particularly important to ensure that the individuals sentenced to death are guilty, that they received full and fair procedures, and that they do not spend excessively long periods of time on death row. Courts must also ensure that executions take place through means that are not inhumane.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the United States William P. Barr, Attorney General… (2020)

The plaintiffs committed their crimes decades ago and have long exhausted all avenues for direct and collateral review. The first of their executions was scheduled to take place this afternoon, with others to follow this week and next month.To carry out these sentences, the Federal Government plans to use a single drug—pentobarbital sodium—that "is widely conceded to be able to render a person fully insensate" and "does not carry the risks" of pain that some have associated with other lethal injection protocols.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature