Summary

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 70 - OF INJUSTICE WITH REGARD TO THE PERSON OF THE WITNESS…

Art. 3 - Whether a man's evidence can be rejected without any fault of his? Objection 1: It would seem that a man's evidence ought not to be rejected except on account of some fault. For it a penalty on some that their evidence is inadmissible, as in the case of those who are branded with infamy. Now a penalty must not be inflicted save for a fault. Therefore it would seem that no man's evidence ought to be rejected save on account of a fault.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 70 - OF INJUSTICE WITH REGARD TO THE PERSON OF THE WITNESS…

In giving evidence a man ought not to affirm as certain, as though he knew it, that about which he is not certain and he should confess his doubt in doubtful terms, and that which he is certain about, in terms of certainty. Owing however to the frailty of the human memory, a man sometimes thinks he is certain about something that is not true
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Aquinas Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologiae — Question 70 - OF INJUSTICE WITH REGARD TO THE PERSON OF THE WITNESS…

I answer that, We must make a distinction in the matter of giving evidence: because sometimes a certain man's evidence is necessary, and sometimes not. If the necessary evidence is that of a man subject to a superior whom, in matters pertaining to justice, he is bound to obey, without doubt he is bound to give evidence on those points which are required of him in accordance with the order of justice, for instance on manifest things or when ill-report has preceded.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature