Summary

Thurgood Marshall Mansell v. Mansell — Opinion of the Court

The legislative history does not indicate the reason for Congress' decision to shelter from community property law that portion of military retirement pay waived to receive veterans' disability payments. [14] But the absence of legislative history on this decision is immaterial in light of the plain and precise language of the statute; Congress is not required to build a record in the legislative history to defend its policy choices.
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Mansell v. Mansell — Opinion of the Court

Because pre-existing federal law, as construed by this Court, completely pre-empted the application of state community property law to military retirement pay, Congress could overcome the McCarty decision only by enacting an affirmative grant of authority giving the States the power to treat military retirement pay as community property.
Source: Wikisource

Thurgood Marshall Mansell v. Mansell — Opinion of the Court

In order to prevent double dipping, a military retiree may receive disability benefits only to the extent that he waives a corresponding amount of his military retirement pay. § 3105. [1] Because disability benefits are exempt from federal, state, and local taxation, § 3101 (a) , military retirees who waive their retirement pay in favor of disability benefits increase their after-tax income. Not surprisingly, waivers of retirement pay are common.
California, like several other States, treats property acquired during marriage as community property.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature