Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Anderson v. Martin — Opinion of the Court

But by placing at racial label on a candidate at the most crucial stage in the electoral process-the instant before the vote is cast-the State furnishes a vehicle by which racial prejudice may be so aroused as to operate against one group because of race and for another. This is true because by directing the citizen's attention to the single consideration of race or color, the State indicates that a candidate's race or color is an important-perhaps paramount-consideration in the citizen's choice, which may becisively influence the citizen to cast his ballot along racial lines.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Anderson v. Martin — Opinion of the Court

It has nothing whatever to do with the right of a citizen to cast his vote for whomever he chooses and for whatever reason he pleases or to receive all information concerning a candidate which is necessary to a proper exercise of his franchise. It has to do only with the right of a State to require or encourage its voters to discriminate upon the grounds of race. In the abstract, Louisiana imposes no restriction upon anyone's candidacy nor upon an elector's choice in the casting of his ballot.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature