Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Hadnott v. Amos (394 U.S. 358)…

While the regulation of corrupt practices in state and federal elections is an important governmental function, we refuse to accept a reading of an Act which gives such a loose meaning to words and such discretionary authority to election officials as to cause Fifteenth and First Amendments rights to be subject to disparate treatment. That risk is compounded here where the penalty is the irrevocable striking of candidates from the ballot without notice or an opportunity for contest and correction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Hadnott v. Amos (394 U.S. 358)…

A like provision bars probate judges from printing on ballots the names of candidates for county offices unless they have filed a declaration of intention on or before the prior March 1. Accordingly, appellees justify their disqualification of NDPA candidates in Etowah, Marengo, and Sumter Counties, and Judge Herndon justifies his omission of those candidates from the Greene County ballot, on the ground that they did not comply with the Garrett Act.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature