Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark County of Marin v. United States…

In determining whether the Commission had jurisdiction in this case, we must examine the proposed transaction in light of the congressional purpose and statutory language. The Commission and the companies regard the transaction as an 'acquisition' of Golden Gate by Pacific Greyhound, within the language of § 5 (2) (a) authorizing Commission approval '* * * for any carrier * * * to acquire control of another through ownership of its stock or otherwise.' We think it is clear that this contemplates an acquisition, by one carrier, of another carrier.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark County of Marin v. United States…

At issue here is the exclusive and plenary authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission to approve a transaction in which Pacific Greyhound Lines, a motor carrier subsidiary of the Greyhound Corporation, [1] would transfer its operations in the San Francisco Bay area to Golden Gate Transit Lines, a subsidiary of Pacific Greyhound organized by it for that purpose. Pacific Greyhound would receive all Golden Gate capital stock in exchange for the operating rights, certain equipment, and an amount in cash.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature