Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Irvin v. Dowd (366 U.S. 717) — Opinion of the Court

To hold that the mere existence of any preconceived notion as to the guilt or innocence of an accused, without more, is sufficient to rebut the presumption of a prospective juror's impartiality would be to establish an impossible standard. It is sufficient if the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Irvin v. Dowd (366 U.S. 717) — Opinion of the Court

Where one's life is at stake and accounting for the frailties of human nature-we can only say that in the light of the circumstances here the finding of impartiality does not meet constitutional standards. Two-thirds of the jurors had an opinion that petitioner was guilty and were familiar with the material facts and circumstances involved, including the fact that other murders were attributed to him, some going so far as to say that it would take evidence to overcome their belief.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature