Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Borden Company…

The District Court allowed this manner of justification because 'most chain stores do purchase larger volumes of milk than do most independent stores.' However, such a grouping for cost justification purposes, composed as it is of some independents having volumes comparable to, and in some cases larger than, that of the chain stores, created artificial disparities between the larger independents and the chain stores. It is like averaging one horse and one rabbit.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark United States v. Borden Company…

At some point practical considerations shade into a circumvention of the proviso. A balance is struck by the use of classes for cost justification which are composed of members of such selfsameness as to make the averaging of the cost of dealing with the group a valid and reasonable indicium of the cost of dealing with any specific group member. [12] High on the list of 'musts' in the use of the average cost of customer groupings under the proviso of § 2 (a) is a close resemblance of the individual members of each group on the essential point or points which determine the costs considered.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature