Summary

Vaughn R. Walker,  Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 6:Credibility Determinations--Plaintiffs' Witnesses (2010)

“ Letitia Anne Peplau, a psychologist, was qualified as an expert on couple relationships within the field of psychology. Peplau offered four opinions: (1) for adults who choose to enter marriage, that marriage is often associated with many important benefits; (2) research has shown remarkable similarities between same-sex and opposite-sex couples; (3) if same-sex couples are permitted to marry, they will likely experience the same benefits from marriage as opposite-sex couples; and (4) permitting same-sex marriage will not harm opposite-sex marriage. ”
Source: Wikisource

Vaughn R. Walker,  Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 6:Credibility Determinations--Plaintiffs' Witnesses (2010)

“ And when I think of protecting your children, you protect them from people who will perpetrate crimes against them, people who might get them hooked on a drug, a pedophile, or some person that you need protecting from. You don't protect yourself from an amicable person or a good person. You protect yourself from things that can harm you physically, emotionally. ”
Source: Wikisource

Vaughn R. Walker,  Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 6:Credibility Determinations--Plaintiffs' Witnesses (2010)

“ I love him probably more than I love myself.") Paul Katami, a plaintiff, testified about his reasons for wanting to marry Zarrillo. (Tr 89:1-3: "Being able to call him my husband is so definitive, it changes our relationship." Tr 90:24-91:2: "I can safely say that if I were married to Jeff, that I know that the struggle that we have validating ourselves to other people would be diminished and potentially eradicated.") Katami explained why it was difficult for him to tell others about his sexual orientation even though he has [p. 26] been gay for "as long as [he] can remember." ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature