Summary

Vaughn R. Walker Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 11:Findings of Fact--Whether The Evidence Shows That Proposition 8… (2010)

The campaign conveyed a message that gay people and relationships are inferior, that homosexuality is undesirable and that children need to be protected from exposure to gay people and their relationships. The most striking image is of the little girl who comes in to tell her mom that she learned that a princess can marry a princess, which strongly echoes the idea that mere exposure to gay people and their relationships is going to lead a generation of young people to become gay, which voters are to understand as undesirable.
Source: Wikisource

Vaughn R. Walker Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 11:Findings of Fact--Whether The Evidence Shows That Proposition 8… (2010)

The difference between domestic partnerships and marriage is more than simply a word. If we look at public opinion data, for example, there is a sizable proportion of the public, both in California and the United States, who say that they are willing to let same-sex couples have domestic partnerships or civil unions, but not marriage.
Source: Wikisource

Vaughn R. Walker Perry v. Schwarzenegger — 11:Findings of Fact--Whether The Evidence Shows That Proposition 8… (2010)

What we're really talking about in the nonquantifiable impacts are the long-term advantages of marriage as an institution, and the long-term costs of discrimination as a way that weakens people's productivity and integration into the labor force. Whether it's weakening their education because they're discriminated against at school, or leading them to excessive reliance on behavioral and other health services, these are impacts that are hard to quantify, but they can wind up being extremely powerful.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature