Summary

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger First National Bank in Plant City v…

Unquestionably, a competitive advantage accrues to a bank that provides the service of receiving money for deposit at a place away from its main office; the convenience to the customer is unrelated to whether the relationship of debtor and creditor is established at the moment of receipt or somewhat later.
We need not characterize the contracts as a sham or subterfuge in order to conclude that the conduct of the parties and the nature of their relations bring First National's challenged activities within the federal definition of branch banking.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger First National Bank in Plant City v…

First National relies heavily, if indeed not entirely, upon carefully drawn contracts with its customers who use armored car or deposit receptacle services. The bank urges that, 'deposit' being a word of art, the determination of when a deposit is made is not a casual one inasmuch as that determination fixes important legal relationships of the parties.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger First National Bank in Plant City v…

We have no difficulty accepting the bank's argument that the debtor-creditor relationship is a creature of contract and that the parties can agree that until monies are physically delivered to the bank no deposit will be credited to the customer's account. [9] We are satisfied, however, that the contracts have no significant purpose other than to remove the possibility that the monies received will become 'deposits' in the technical and legal sense until actually delivered to the chartered premises of the bank.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature