Summary

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Mayberry v. Pennsylvania — Concurrence

No circumstance that comes to mind allows an accused to interfere with the absolute right of a trial judge to have such 'standby counsel' to protect the rights of accused persons 'foolishly trying to defend themselves,' as Mr. Justice DOUGLAS so aptly described it. In every trial there is more at stake than just the interests of the accused; the integrity of the process warrants a trial judge's exercising his discretion to have counsel participate in the defense even when rejected.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Mayberry v. Pennsylvania — Concurrence

A criminal trial is not a private matter; the public interest is so great that the presence and participation of counsel, even when opposed by the accused, is warranted in order to vindicate the process itself. The value of the precaution of having independent counsel, even if unwanted, is underscored by situations where the accused is removed from the courtroom under Illinois v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature