Summary

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Palmer v. Thompson — Concurrence

I conclude that though a State may discontinue any of its municipal services-such as schools, parks, pools, athletic fields, and the like-it may not do so for the purpose of perpetuating or installing apartheid or because it finds life in a multi-racial community difficult or unpleasant. If that is its reason, then abolition of a designated public service becomes a device for perpetuating a segregated way of life.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Palmer v. Thompson — Concurrence

Unfortunately the growing burdens and shrinking revenues of municipal and state governments may lead to more and more curtailment of desirable services. Inevitably every such constriction will affect some groups or segments of the community more than others. To find an equal protection issue in every closing of public swimming pools, tennis courts, or golf courses would distort beyond reason the meaning of that important constitutional guarantee.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature