Summary

Warsaw Message — February 11, 1843…

It is the duty of the State of Illinois, to make it criminal in one of its citizens to aid, abet counsel, or advise, any person to commit a crime in her sister State,--any one violating the law would be amenable to the laws of Illinois, executed by its own tribunals. Those of Missouri could have no agency in his conviction and punishment. But if he shall go into Missouri, he owes obedience to her laws, and is liable before her courts, to be tried and punished for any crime he may commit there and a plea that he was a citizen of another State, would not avail him.
Source: Wikisource

Warsaw Message — February 11, 1843…

Boggs having the 'evidence and information is his possession,' should have incorporated it in the affidavit to enable the Court to judge of their sufficiency to support his 'belief.'--Again, he swears to a legal conclusion when he says that Smith was accessary before the fact. What acts constitute a man an accessary is a question of law and not always of easy solution. Mr. Boggs' opinion, then, is not authority. He should have given the facts. He should have shown that they were committed in Missouri, to see if they amounted to a crime.
Source: Wikisource

Warsaw Message — February 11, 1843…

He may declare war and make peace, and as nations often do who 'feel power and forget right,'--may oppress, rob and subjugate his weaker and unoffending neighbors. He unites in his person the legislative, judicial and executive power--can do no wrong, because there is none to hold him to account.--But when he unites himself with a community, he lays down all the prerogatives of sovereign (except self-defence,) and becomes a subject.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature