Summary

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals…

We think that the character of the work to be done by the board, the quasi judicial nature of its duties, the magnitude of the interests to be affected by its decisions, all require that those who represent the taxpayers in the hearings should be persons whose qualities as lawyers or accountants will secure proper service to their clients and to help the board in the discharge of its important duties.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals…

The court was given by statute power to make rules for regulating the forms and mode of procedure for the court, and this was held to include the power to make rules for the admission of persons to prosecute claims before the court as agents or attorneys for the claimants. It was pointed out in support of the construction that claimants were not compelled to appear in person to present their claims as the taxpayers are not before the Board of Tax Appeals.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Howard Taft William Howard Taft Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals…

In most of the executive departments in which interests of individuals as claimants or taxpayers are to be passed on by executive officers or boards, authority is exercised to limit those who act for them as attorneys to persons of proper character and qualification to do so. Not in frequently, statutory provision is made for requiring a list of enrolled attorneys to which a practitioner must be admitted by the executive officer or tribunal.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature