William J. Brennan, Jr.

Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. Labine v. Vincent — Dissent

In short, the Court has not analyzed, or perhaps simply refuses to analyze, Louisiana's discrimination against acknowledged illegitimates in terms of the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. [18] Since I still believe that the Constitution does prohibit a State from denying any person the 'equal protection of the laws,' I must therefore undertake my own analysis to determine, at a minimum, whether there is any rational basis for the discrimination, or whether the classification bears any intelligible proper relationship to the consequences that flow from it.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Labine v. Vincent — Dissent

But, for purposes of this case, I need only discuss those portions of Louisiana law that bear upon inheritance rights. Article 178 of the Louisiana Civil Code provides in full: 'Children are either legitimate, illegitimate, or legitimated.' Not all illegitimate children can be legitimated, however-only those whose parents do not have legitimate descendants or ascendants and could lawfully have married each other at the time of the child's conception, or those whose parents later marry can be legitimated.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Labine v. Vincent — Dissent

Even if Louisiana law could be read as being based on a legislative judgment about parents' intent, the present discrimination against illegitimates could not stand. In order to justify a discrimination on the ground that it reflects a legislative judgment about the desires of most persons in similar situations, there must be some rational basis [21] for finding that the legislative classification does reflect those persons' desires or intentions as a general matter.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature