Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. Perkins v. Matthews — Opinion of the Court

A whole arsenal of racist weapons has been perfected. Boundary lines have been gerrymandered, elections have been switched to an at-large basis, counties have been consolidated, elective offices have been abolished where blacks had a chance of winning, the appointment process has been substituted for the elective process, election officials have withheld the necessary information for voting or running for office, and both physical and economic intimidation have been employed.↑ Congress has extended the life of the 1965 Act, including § 5, from 1970 to 1975.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Perkins v. Matthews — Opinion of the Court

There is surely no doubt today that the right to vote can be curtailed as effectively by an impermissible demarcation of an elected official's constituency as by the destruction of ballots or the refusal to permit access to the voting booth.' Memorandum for the United States as Amicus Curiae 13. While the Government was arguing there that § 5 reached a change from ward to at-large elections, its interpretation is equally germane to the boundary annexations in the present case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature