Summary

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan Rowland v. Mad River Local School District… (1985)

These facts are rendered completely unambiguous by the jury's findings. Yet after a jury and the trial court who heard and evaluated the evidence rendered verdicts for petitioner, the court below reversed based on a crabbed reading of our precedents and unexplained disregard of the jury and judge's factual findings. Because they are so patently erroneous, these maneuvers suggest only a desire to evade the central question: may a State dismiss a public employee based on her bisexual status alone? I respectfully dissent from the Court's decision not to give its plenary attention to this issue.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William J. Brennan William J. Brennan Rowland v. Mad River Local School District… (1985)

The court first ruled that in light of our intervening decision in Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983) , the decision to discharge petitioner based on her workplace statements was unobjectionable under the First Amendment because petitioner's speech was not about "a matter of public concern." 730 F.2d, at 451. While accepting the jury's finding that petitioner's mention of her bisexuality had not interfered "in any way" with the "regular operation of the school," the court concluded that it was constitutionally permissible to dismiss petitioner "for talking about it."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature