Summary

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Dennis v. United States (339 U.S. 162…

In this case, no more than the trial court can we without injustice take judicial notice of a miasma of fear to which Government employees are claimed to be peculiarly vulnerable-and from which other citizens are by implication immune. Vague conjecture does not convince that Government employees are so intimidated that they cringe before their Government in fear of investigation and loss of employment if they do their duty as jurors, which duty this same Government has imposed upon them.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Dennis v. United States (339 U.S. 162…

No question of actual bias is before us. The way is open in every case to raise a contention of bias from the realm of speculation to the realm of fact. In both the Wood and Frazier cases this Court stressed that while impaneling a jury the trial court has a serious duty to determine the question of actual bias, and a broad discretion in its rulings on challenges therefor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Dennis v. United States (339 U.S. 162…

In exercising its discretion, the trial court must be zealous to protect the rights of an accused. And we agree that this the court must do without reference to an accused's political or religious beliefs, however such beliefs may be received by a predominant segment of our population. Ideological status is not an appropriate gauge of the high standard of justice toward which our courts may not be content only to strive.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature