Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry…

In any event the FCC has seemed content to leave to the Federal Trade Commission the regulation of much of the field, particularly the policing of false, misleading or deceptive advertising designed for radio and television broadcast. While the FCC has consistently warned its licensees that the continued broadcasting of material found by the FTC to be deceptive or misleading 'would raise serious questions as to whether such stations are operating in the public interest,' its policy seems to have been to leave the matter of direct and immediate sanctions largely to the Trade Commission.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry…

The New Mexico law is one designed principally to protect the State's consumers against a local evil by local application to forbid certain forms of advertising in all mass media. Such legislation, whether concerned with the health and safety of consumers, or with their protection against fraud and deception, embodies a traditional state interest of the sort which our decisions have consistently respected.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry…

I agree that, as the Court says, the New Mexico statute is not displaced by the FCC's powers 'governing the granting, renewal, and revocation of broadcasting licenses.' If that were the only sanction which the Commission might apply to the advertising practices which the New Mexico statute forbids, the basis for any claim of the federal statute's preemptive effect would be removed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature