Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections…

The present requirement, applicable to members of all races, is that the prospective voter 'be able to read and write any section of the Constitution of North Carolina in the English language.' That seems to us to be one fair way of determining whether a person is literate, not a calculated scheme to lay springes for the citizen.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections…

In Louisiana one qualifies if he can read and write English or his mother tongue, is of good character, and understands the duties and obligations of citizenship under a republican form of government. If he cannot read and write, he can qualify if he can give a reasonable interpretion of a section of the State or Federal Constitution when read to him, and if he is attached to the principles of the Federal and State Constitutions.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections…

Illiterate people may be intelligent voters. Yet in our society where newspapers, periodicals, books, and other printed matter canvass and debate campaign issues, a State might conclude that only those who are literate should exercise the franchise. Cf. Franklin v. Harper, 205 Ga. 779, 55 S.E.2d 221, appeal dismissed 339 U.S. 946, 70 S.Ct. 804, 94 L.Ed. 1361. It was said last century in Massachusetts that a literacy test was designed to insure an 'independent and intelligent' exercise of the right of suffrage. [7] Stone v. Smith, 159 Mass. 413-414, 34 N.E. 521. North Carolina agrees.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature